Evolution Petroleum Corporation (NYSEAMERICAN: EPM) Files An 8-K Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

0
Evolution Petroleum Corporation (NYSEAMERICAN: EPM) Files An 8-K Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Evolution Petroleum Corporation (NYSEAMERICAN: EPM) Files An 8-K Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

On December 6, 2018, Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") held its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") in Houston, Texas at the Company’s principal executive offices. The stockholders of the Company considered and voted upon the three proposals listed below, each of which is more fully described in the Company's definitive proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2018. Holders of 30,838,302 shares of common stock of the Company, representing approximately 93% of the Company's 33,157,852 issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of the October 22, 2018 record date, were present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, which constituted a quorum for such meeting. The final voting results with respect to each of the proposals is set forth below.

Proposal 1. Election of Directors. The Company's stockholders elected five directors to serve a one-year term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The results of the voting for each nominee were as follows:

Name of the Nominee

For

% of Voted*

Withheld

BrokerNon-Votes

Edward J. DiPaolo

22,473,098

95.8

%

977,886

7,387,318

William E. Dozier

22,525,164

96.1

%

925,820

7,387,318

Robert S. Herlin

22,540,527

96.1

%

910,457

7,387,318

Kelly W. Loyd

23,015,112

98.1

%

435,872

7,387,318

Marran H. Ogilvie

22,342,870

95.3

%

1,108,114

7,387,318

No other person received any votes.

Proposal 2. The appointment of Moss AdamsLLP, as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending June30, 2019 was ratified. The voting results were as follows:

For

% of Voted*

Against

Abstain

Broker Non-Votes

30,662,148

99.4

%

121,042

55,112

Proposal 3. The stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation for the Company's Named Executive Officers. The voting results were as follows:

For

% of Voted*

Against

Abstain

Broker Non-Votes

22,175,697

94.6

%

1,085,502

189,785

7,387,318

* Any broker non-votes count toward the determination of a quorum for the Annual Meeting, but are excluded from the denominator in the calculation of the percentage of shares voting. Abstentions are counted towards the tabulation of votes cast on matters properly presented to the stockholders (except the election of directors) and have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast, and therefore they have no effect on the outcome of the matters presented at the Annual Meeting.