COMMERCEHUB,INC. (NASDAQ:CHUBA) Files An 8-K Other EventsItem 8.01. Other Events
On May7, 2018, the following disclosure was filed by CommerceHub,Inc. (the “Company” or “CommerceHub”) as a supplement (the “Supplement”) to the definitive proxy statement filed by CommerceHub with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April18, 2018 (the “Proxy Statement”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company’s board of directors for the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May18, 2018 and any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Special Meeting”). This supplemental information should be read together with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Terms used in this Current Report on Form8-K and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Proxy Statement.
On April27, 2018, a putative class action complaint was filed by a purported stockholder of CommerceHub in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York: Gordon v. CommerceHub,Inc., et al., Case No.1:18-cv-00512-FJS-DJS. The complaint names as defendants CommerceHub and members of CommerceHub’s board of directors. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 14(a)and 20(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rulesand regulations promulgated thereunder, and alleges that CommerceHub and the members of CommerceHub’s board of directors caused a proxy statement that allegedly omitted material information to be filed in connection with the merger, which allegedly rendered the proxy statement false and misleading. In particular, the complaint alleges that CommerceHub omitted material information from the disclosures made in the Proxy Statement regarding the merger proposal. Among other relief, the complaint seeks a declaration certifying a class, an injunction to prevent CommerceHub from holding the Special Meeting to vote on the merger agreement and from consummating the merger unless and until CommerceHub discloses the material information allegedly omitted from the Proxy Statement, unspecified damages, and unspecified costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. CommerceHub believes that the lawsuit is without merit and that no further disclosure is required to supplement the Proxy Statement under applicable laws. However, in order to eliminate the burden, expense and uncertainties resulting from the pending litigation and without admitting any wrongdoing or that these supplemental disclosures are material or required to be made, on May7, 2018, CommerceHub agreed to supplement the disclosures in the Proxy Statement as set forth below. Consequently, the plaintiff agreed to withdraw the lawsuit with prejudice.
Supplemental Disclosure Concerning the Merger Proposal
The merger proposal seeks stockholder approval for the adoption of the merger agreement. The Company is supplementing its disclosure with respect to the merger proposal with additional information concerning certain non-disclosure agreements entered into by various bidders and the prior relationships between the Company’s financial advisor, Evercore, and GTCR.
In connection with the merger proposal, the information set forth under the caption “Background of the Merger” in the last paragraph on page29 of the Proxy Statement is amended as follows:
Accordingly, and at the direction of the board, over the next several weeks, Evercore proceeded to contact seven potential financial purchasers, including GTCR. Evercore also contacted one additional strategic party owned by a financial sponsor, which declined to pursue the acquisition of CommerceHub. Of the seven potential financial purchasers contacted, five of them (including GTCR) entered into non-disclosure agreements with CommerceHub by mid-Novemberand two elected not to proceed. After initially entering into a non-disclosure agreement with CommerceHub, an additional one of the potential financial purchasers declined to participate shortly thereafter. Certain of the non-disclosure agreements entered into between CommerceHub and potential purchasers included a standstill and certain restrictions on the potential purchasers’ ability to request a waiver of such standstill from CommerceHub. All such provisions (other than those applicable to Sponsor B as further described below) fell away upon entry by CommerceHub into the merger agreement. Each non-disclosure agreement was negotiated by CommerceHub on an arms’-length basis with the applicable potential purchaser.
In connection with the merger proposal, the information set forth under the caption “Background of the Merger” in the third full paragraph on page32 of the Proxy Statement is amended as follows:
On January29, 2018, CommerceHub executed a non-disclosure agreement with Sponsor B (the “Sponsor B NDA”) and opened the virtual data room to representatives of Sponsor B. Similar to the other non-disclosure agreements executed with potential financial purchasers as described