1ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP (NASDAQ:FCCY) Files An 8-K Other Events
Item 8.01.
On August 30, 2019, 1st Constitution Bancorp (“1st Constitution”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive proxy statement-prospectus with respect to the special meeting of shareholders of Shore Community Bank, a New Jersey-chartered bank (“Shore”), scheduled to be held on October 18, 2019. Shore shareholders will be asked at the special meeting to vote on a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among 1st Constitution, 1st Constitution Bank, a New Jersey-chartered bank and wholly owned subsidiary of 1st Constitution, and Shore, dated as of June 23, 2019 (the “merger agreement”), among other proposals. to the merger agreement, Shore will merge with and into 1st Constitution Bank with 1st Constitution Bank as the surviving entity (the “merger”), at the effective time of the merger.
A purported securities class action lawsuit has been filed against 1st Constitution, 1st Constitution Bank, Shore and each of the members of the Board of Directors of Shore in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County, Chancery Division. Captioned Parshall v. Shore Community Bank, Docket No. C164-19 (N.J. Super. Ct.), the complaint was filed on September 9, 2019 (the “Complaint”), purports to have been brought on behalf of all public shareholders of Shore, and seeks to enjoin the defendants from proceeding with the shareholder vote on the merger agreement at the special meeting or consummating the proposed merger unless and until 1st Constitution and Shore disclose allegedly omitted information, in addition to paying damages allegedly suffered by the plaintiffs as a result of the asserted omissions, as well as attorneys’ fees and expenses.
1st Constitution and Shore believe that all allegations in the Complaint are without merit, and further believe that no supplemental disclosure is required under applicable laws; however, 1st Constitution and Shore wish to make certain supplemental disclosures related to the merger solely for the purpose of mooting the allegations contained in the Complaint and avoiding the expense and burden of litigation. Nothing in the supplemental disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable law of any of the supplemental disclosures.
Important information concerning the merger is set forth in the proxy statement-prospectus. The proxy statement-prospectus is amended and supplemented by, and should be read as part of, and in conjunction with, the information set forth in this Current Report on Form 8-K.
SUPPLEMENT TO PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS
1st Constitution and Shore have agreed to make the following amended and supplemental disclosures to the proxy statement-prospectus. This supplemental information should be read in conjunction with the proxy statement-prospectus, which should be read in its entirety. Certain terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the proxy statement-prospectus. Without admitting in any way that the disclosures below are material or otherwise required by law, 1st Constitution and Shore make the following amended and supplemental disclosures:
Background of the Merger
The non-disclosure agreement executed by the financial institutions contacted by Raymond James did not contain “don’t ask, don’t waive” provisions.
1st Constitution’s initial indication letter, dated March 12, 2019, offered one seat on each of the Boards of Directors of 1st Constitution and 1st Constitution Bank to a Shore director to be selected by 1st Constitution. This offer remained through the negotiations and was not revised. Continued employment by executives of Shore was never made a part of the negotiations of the merger agreement, and Mr. Robert English, Shore’s President and CEO, will not remain with either 1st Constitution or 1st Constitution Bank after the closing of the merger.
Opinion of Shore’s Financial Advisor:
In the discounted cash flow analysis of Shore performed by Raymond James in connection with its opinion, the following estimates of excess cash flows that Shore could generate over the period from March 31, 2019 through December 31, 2024 as a stand-alone company were derived from the estimated earnings, which were used and relied upon by Raymond James at the direction of Shore management and with consent of Shore, in excess of an amount assumed to be retained by Shore to maintain the assumed tangible common equity to assets ratio: